![emacs lisp emacs lisp](https://kirelos.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/echo/2-8.png)
Both men had no hesitation in causing death and destruction on a massive scale to further their ends.
#Emacs lisp series
Both Hitler and Putin invaded a series of neighboring countries, both used lies and disinformation to justify their actions, both used a symbol–in Putin’s case “Z,” in Hitler’s the swastika–to advertise support for their aims. Evans ( New Statesman, 4/9/22) listed several ways Putin could be compared to Hitler, including the argument that genocide was at “the heart of the Nazi project,” and Russia’s actions in Ukraine amount to genocide because Ukrainians “are being killed because they are Ukrainians, and for no other reason.” Furthermore:īoth men had imposed dictatorial rule over their respective countries, both men suppressed dissent and eliminated independent media, both men had no hesitation in murdering people they considered a threat to their rule. (Many of the Jews killed by Hitler were, of course, ethnically German, as were countless other victims of Hitler, if that makes a moral difference.) In the early days of the Ukraine crisis, former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul implied to guest host Ali Velshi on Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC show (3/11/22) that Putin was worse than Hitler, because Putin was killing his own people, while Hitler “didn’t kill ethnic Germans.” McFaul’s comments were later shared without attribution or pushback by the Maddow blog on Twitter ( 3/12/22)-suggesting that Maddow’s show endorsed McFaul’s comparative ranking of Putin and Hitler-before being removed following social media backlash and a correction by the Auschwitz Memorial. Tracing a connection between Putin and Hitler is an even more insidious attempt to make the idea of a negotiated end to the war seem like a moral outrage. Nevertheless, FAIR ( 3/7/14, 1/15/22, 1/28/22, 2/23/22) has covered the Western media’s denial of the far-right’s role in the Ukrainian 2014 coup, as well as their complicity in amplifying Ukrainian neo-Nazi publicity stunts during the war.īut if it’s true that falsely associating a government with Nazism is a manipulation worthy of condemnation, how then should one judge Western media efforts to tie Russian President Vladimir Putin to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler?įAIR ( 3/30/22) has previously noted how evidence-free caricatures in Western media of Putin as irrational (and perhaps psychotic) make diplomatic efforts to end the Ukraine crisis seem pointless. To say Ukraine is “filled” with Nazis is an obvious exaggeration, although even a relatively small number of Nazis has wielded disproportionate influence in the Ukrainian government ( Kyiv Post, 3/26/19 Euronews, 8/4/21). The lie that the government and culture of Ukraine are filled with dangerous “Nazis” has become a central theme of Kremlin propaganda about the war. The New York Times ( 7/2/22) attributed a spike in mentions of Nazism at the start of Putin’s invasion of Ukraine to Putin describing Ukraine as “full of Nazis,” but did not discuss Western media comparing Putin to Hitler.Įarlier this month, a New York Times ( 7/2/22) report, “How the Russian Media Spread False Claims About Ukrainian Nazis,” argued that falsely branding people as Nazis is inherently propagandistic: As always with Mickey’s posts, this one is very much worth reading Especially Ramin Honary’s comment on using coterm for better terminal emulation. I like Vterm because it gives a much better emulation than the others but as Mickey says, you won’t have the valuable Emacs features available for working with the buffer.įinally, there’s a long list of comments that are also worth reading.
![emacs lisp emacs lisp](https://wtmatter.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Emacs-Lisp.png)
These have the advantage that you’re working in an Emacs buffer so you have all the usual Emacs capabilities available for working with the text. If you do need a shell, Mickey recommends either shell or eshell. Even as a long time command line guy, I’ve found that I rarely need to invoke a shell these days. Emacs, after all, has Dired for file manipulation, Magit for Git interaction, built-in network utilities, and the compile function to compile and test your code. Mickey’s first recommendation is to consider whether you need a shell at all.
#Emacs lisp how to
Mickey’s post tells you how to work around some of those limitations and how to do things like change the default shell or stop the duplicate echoing of shell input. If you’ve used any of those you know that they all have limitations. The subject can be a little confusing-mostly centering around the difference between a shell and an emulator-so if you’ve ever been uncertain if you should be running shell, term, or ansi-term be sure to check out his post.
![emacs lisp emacs lisp](https://i.stack.imgur.com/dqjhz.png)
Mickey from Mastering Emacs has posted an excellent summary of shells & emulators in Emacs.